Heterogeneity among countries in the subspecialty of cardiovascular anesthesia in latin america: survey results

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographics, workload, training, facilities, and equipment in cardiovascular anesthesia (CVA) in Latin America (LA). DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study with data collected through a survey. SETTING: A multicenter, international web-based questionnaire that included 37 multiple-choice questions. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and specialists in anesthesiology who regularly participated in cardiovascular surgeries and were members of the scientific societies of the Latin American Confederation of Anesthesiology. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 484 completed questionnaires were collected. A total of 97.8% of the respondents had a university degree in anesthesiology. Most did not receive formal training in CVA, and only 41.5% received formal training. Moreover, most of them were trained in their own country, and a smaller percentage were trained abroad. Half of the respondents reported receiving <12 months of training. A third part of the respondents had received training in transesophageal echocardiography. Only 5.8% of the respondents worked exclusively in CVA, and a high percentage dedicated <60% of their weekly work hours to this subspecialty. A total of 80.6% of the centers had <3 cardiac surgery operating rooms. Only one-third of the centers performed heart/lung transplantation, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and ventricular assist device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: A significant lack of training programs in anesthesiology practice and complex procedures in medical centers in LA are evident. Thus, basic accredited programs should be developed in medical centers in LA.

Heterogeneity Among Countries in the Subspecialty of Cardiovascular Anesthesia in Latin America: Survey Results.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographics, workload, training, facilities, and equipment in cardiovascular anesthesia (CVA) in Latin America (LA). DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study with data collected through a survey. SETTING: A multicenter, international web-based questionnaire that included 37 multiple-choice questions. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and specialists in anesthesiology who regularly participated in cardiovascular surgeries and were members of the scientific societies of the Latin American Confederation of Anesthesiology. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 484 completed questionnaires were collected. A total of 97.8% of the respondents had a university degree in anesthesiology. Most did not receive formal training in CVA, and only 41.5% received formal training. Moreover, most of them were trained in their own country, and a smaller percentage were trained abroad. Half of the respondents reported receiving <12 months of training. A third part of the respondents had received training in transesophageal echocardiography. Only 5.8% of the respondents worked exclusively in CVA, and a high percentage dedicated <60% of their weekly work hours to this subspecialty. A total of 80.6% of the centers had <3 cardiac surgery operating rooms. Only one-third of the centers performed heart/lung transplantation, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and ventricular assist device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: A significant lack of training programs in anesthesiology practice and complex procedures in medical centers in LA are evident. Thus, basic accredited programs should be developed in medical centers in LA.

Intraoperative pulmonary hyperdistention estimated by transthoracic lung ultrasound: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic lung ultrasound can assess atelectasis reversal and is considered as unable to detect associated hyperdistention. In this study, we describe an ultrasound pattern highly suggestive of pulmonary hyperdistention. METHODS: Eighteen patients with normal lungs undergoing lower abdominal surgery were studied. Electrical impedance tomography was calibrated, followed by anaesthetic induction, intubation and mechanical ventilation. To reverse posterior atelectasis, a recruitment manoeuvre was performed. Positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration was then obtained during a descending trial - 20, 18, 16, 14, 12, 10, 8, 6 and 4cmH2O. Ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography data were collected at each PEEP level and interpreted by two independent observers. Spearman correlation test and receiving operating characteristic curve were used to compare lung ultrasound and electrical impedance tomography data. RESULTS: The number of horizontal A lines increased linearly with PEEP: from 3 (0, 5) at PEEP 4cmH2O to 10 (8, 13) at PEEP 20cmH2O. The increase number of A lines was associated with a parallel and significant decrease in intercostal space thickness (p=0.001). The lung ultrasound threshold for detecting pulmonary hyperdistention was defined as the number of A lines counted at the PEEP preceding the PEEP providing the best respiratory compliance. Six A lines was the median threshold for detecting pulmonary hyperdistention. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve was 0.947. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transthoracic lung ultrasound can detect lung hyperdistention during a PEEP descending trial. Six or more A lines detected in normally aerated regions can be considered as indicating lung hyperdistention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02314845 Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual Positive End-expiratory Pressure Settings Optimize Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Reduce Postoperative Atelectasis.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation has been recommended to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery. Although the protective role of a more physiologic tidal volume has been established, the added protection afforded by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains uncertain. The authors hypothesized that a low fixed PEEP might not fit all patients and that an individually titrated PEEP during anesthesia might improve lung function during and after surgery. METHODS: Forty patients were studied in the operating room (20 laparoscopic and 20 open-abdominal). They underwent elective abdominal surgery and were randomized to institutional PEEP (4 cm H2O) or electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP (applied after recruitment maneuvers and targeted at minimizing lung collapse and hyperdistension, simultaneously). Patients were extubated without changing selected PEEP or fractional inspired oxygen tension while under anesthesia and submitted to chest computed tomography after extubation. Our primary goal was to individually identify the electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP value producing the best compromise of lung collapse and hyperdistention. RESULTS: Electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP varied markedly across individuals (median, 12 cm H2O; range, 6 to 16 cm H2O; 95% CI, 10-14). Compared with PEEP of 4 cm H2O, patients randomized to the electrical impedance tomography-guided strategy had less postoperative atelectasis (6.2 ± 4.1 vs. 10.8 ± 7.1% of lung tissue mass; P = 0.017) and lower intraoperative driving pressures (mean values during surgery of 8.0 ± 1.7 vs. 11.6 ± 3.8 cm H2O; P < 0.001). The electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP arm had higher intraoperative oxygenation (435 ± 62 vs. 266 ± 76 mmHg for laparoscopic group; P < 0.001), while presenting equivalent hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure during surgery of 80 ± 14 vs. 78 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.821). CONCLUSIONS: PEEP requirements vary widely among patients receiving protective tidal volumes during anesthesia for abdominal surgery. Individualized PEEP settings could reduce postoperative atelectasis (measured by computed tomography) while improving intraoperative oxygenation and driving pressures, causing minimum side effects.